Can a single cell be intelligent?

The quest to find intelligent behavior in animals has been a long one, and it has unraveled some rather spectacular examples. Witness, just to mention a few, crows creating their own tools, sea slugs that learn through conditioning, and magpies who can recognise their own reflection in a mirror.

How complex does an animal have to be in order to show signs of intelligence? Not very, according to Toshiyuki Nagakaki and his co-workers, who claim to have seen intelligent behavior in the slime mold. This fascinating and beautiful life form consists of single cells that often live separately but that are able to join up and form an organism consisting of a single cell with very many nuclei. Thus, the cell nuclei can exist in two radically different levels of social complexity.

In their paper, Nagakaki et al have used the slime mold physarum polycephalum. This mold forms a network with pulsating tubes between food sources. Essentially, what they have been able to show is that the physarum is able to optimise its network structure to form the shortest route between several food sources. Furthermore, it is able to do so in a labyrinth that the scientists had constructed.

Encouraged by this result, Soichiro Tsuda and his colleagues at the University of Southampton have tried a radical approach: they have built a robot controlled by a slime mold brain. In this case, they are using the physarum’s predilection for darkness to let it steer the robot, and they have apparently succeeded in building a system that consistently walks the robot away from light. (Their article gives a brilliant example of the kind of lucid reasoning in which mathematicians and physicists excel.)

These examples challenge the definition of intelligence, but in my opinion they fall short. In neither case does the system show any adaptive behavior. The mold is only able to solve a labyrinth problem by testing all possibilities, i.e. by growing into all parts of the maze and then retracting from those where no food was found. And in the robot case, the mold functions by giving a specific response to a specific stimulus, which any transistor setup could accomplish as easily.

Tsuda and his colleagues note that biological systems display an enviable combination of adaptivity and robustness. Artificial systems have, until now, been unable to replicate this successful trade-off. Tsuda’s proposed solution is to put biological systems in control of the computers, but there exists a different and more appealing way forward. We can learn to understand biological information processing! When we are able to formulate a functional principle-driven model of the cell’s brain, we will be able to replicate it with silicon components.

3 Responses to Can a single cell be intelligent?

  1. J Pettersson says:

    Yeah.. I think were a little locked up in what size a life form is supposed to be.. Intelligens isnt relative to human size and shape.. hance we could find intelligences in both macro- and micro cosm..

    The group behaviour and genetic development of viruses for example, they develop as if the whole can evolve from a mutation, not only the offspring of the successful mutated virus.. Im waiting for more research on the subject, its very intriging. just as the collective counsiousness of ants and beehives.. Seems to me we might have to broaden the definitions of intelligence, tolerating singel cells being intellgent, and the wholeness of hive as well be intelligent, not just the subjects of it..
    intelligence seems to be in layers, just as are own cells, organs is alive and still we are one mind..
    Might intelligence rather be being alive, and how intelligent – a question about how aware we are of ourselfs and whats around us..?

  2. evolvingideas says:

    Hi Jonas!
    Thanks for the comments, I’m glad you have been looking in! I agree with you on the definition of intelligence, most likely it will have to be broadened to include a specific set of functionalities that can partly be found also in very simple biological systems. Will write a post on that at some point!

  3. Hjalmar says:

    Again, being the novice that I am concerning biological systems, I am not sure on what standard we are evaluating “intelligence”. I can only find one explicit criteria for intelligence in your post “… but in my opinion they fall short. In neither case does the system show any adaptive behavior”.

    If you find the time, it would certainly be helpful if you could define, and elaborate on what methods can be used for measuring, intelligence. Or pehaps this is the final goal of you quest, redefinig what can be called intelligence. I am not to know!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: